HealthBench
Fits patient-facing or clinician-facing chat assistants with no tools. Borrow the per-conversation weighted rubric criteria (48,562 written by 262 physicians), the seven themes and behavior axes, and the Consensus and Hard subsets.
What it asks the agent to do
- answer a health question from a member of the public
- handle a clinician request such as summarizing notes or drafting a message
- recognize an emergency and refer the user
- ask for missing context before answering
- tailor depth and wording to the user's expertise
What to borrow from it
grading designcase templatetaxonomy
Caveats
Conversation-only, no tool use or state; most conversations were synthetically generated from physician-written situations; grading depends on a model grader (GPT-4.1 in the reference code); authored by a model vendor; simple-evals is otherwise deprecated and only keeps HealthBench as a reference implementation.
Details
| Workloads | healthcare, knowledge qa, safety |
|---|---|
| Interaction | multi turn scripted |
| Environment | static |
| End state checked | No |
| Tools | none |
| Grading | llm judge |
| Size | 5,000 |
| Data | mixed |
| Personal data | none |
| License | MIT |
| Harness | inspect_evals, own repo |
| Status | active |